Ctruth
"Seeking the Truth about Chronology Today"
Contact
You can directly contact Ctruth at: ChronologyTruth@gmail.com
I will get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
"Seeking the Truth about Chronology Today"
You can directly contact Ctruth at: ChronologyTruth@gmail.com
I will get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Donate to Ctruth
Support Ctruth through a direct donation.
$5.00
Ctruth
Hi Stephen. I’m looking at your work. It’s a big thing thx for your research so I can catch up here!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Nick, I’m glad you’re here 🙂
Feel free to ask me anything
LikeLike
In Chapter 3 of Johnson’s Pauline writings he mentions “Palmoromaica by Rev John Black”:
(in para 4)
“I have entered closely upon this question in a special series of published papers; and, in my inability to treat it in this place, I may here refer my readers to the very valuable work, in English, entitled “Palmoromaica,” ascribed to the Rev. John Black, and published early in this century, where that acute and learned author puts forth a variety of cogent arguments against the Greek and for the Latin original, which may easily be strengthened, and which are powerfully suggestive in the direction of my own researches and discoveries”
Can you throw more light on this please? Is the Rev John Black this one?
He was an expert, a professsor at the western Univ of Penns from 1820-1832:
https://www.covenanter.org/reformed/2015/6/29/john-black-1768-1849
It’s hard to trace a copy of the book from around 1820 I guess, while he was there(Pittsburgh?)
Why has http://radikalkritik.de/?s=Palmoromaica+Rev+John+Black not mentioned it?
It’s completely disappeared without any trace …
Many thanks Stephen
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have found some additional information on Rev John Black and will publish it in an article later this evening
Thanks for bringing this to my attention
LikeLike
Here’s my article on John Black (c.1778-1825): https://ctruth.today/2021/04/27/rev-john-black-c-1778-1825/
I don’t know why RK doesn’t mention it.
I hope my article gives you some leads. The full text of the Palæoromaica is included in a link in that article. Let me know if you have any other questions or find additional information that I can add to my article
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m editing a version of Edwins Pauline epistles on academia.
Updating language etc glossing phrasetis
Tx again for pointing him out to me
Cheers
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome. Be sure to check the Ctruth Youtube channel for the video I just posted. It’s an audiobook version of part of one of his books – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1xeWEi7Vhc&t=1s
LikeLiked by 1 person
It will get more people interested in your site
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://archive.org/details/bodleianmanuscri00euse/page/10/mode/2up
It has some history background you may find some good info here Stephen
LikeLiked by 1 person
thank you
LikeLike
ps. I couldn’t post it on the Vulgate post; “Your comment cannot be posted at this time” it said
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s weird, maybe it was a glitch
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://archive.org/details/WhichVersionByPhilipMauro/page/n33/mode/2up
It happened again!
LikeLike
I’m not sure why that’s happening, I’ll see if I can resovle the issue
LikeLike
Happy Easter Day
It’s not directly connected:
https://stolenhistory.net/threads/did-napoleon-build-the-great-egyptian-pyramids.63/
Lots of cross connections appear …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing. I had a long review of some parts of that article typed out but right as I went to post it it got deleted for whatever reason. I don’t feel like typing it all out again. The gist of it is that the evidence in that thread is incredibly weak. I had reasons why but I really don’t feel like wasting even more time than I already have on it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s disappointing- it ties up with Edwin Johnson’s ideas; even if you can’t support it here.
It’s like Stonehenge setup/rebuilt in the late 50’s:
#JustSaying
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is there a way you can send me the comment through email?
LikeLike
The concept of a “Dark Age” originated in the 1330s with the Italian scholar Petrarch, who regarded the post-Roman centuries as “dark” compared to the “light” of classical antiquity.[3][4] The phrase “Dark Age” itself derives from the Latin saeculum obscurum, originally applied by Caesar Baronius in 1602 to a tumultuous period in the 10th and 11th centuries.[5][6] The concept thus came to characterize the entire Middle Ages as a time of intellectual darkness in Europe between the fall of Rome and the Renaissance; this became especially popular during the 18th-century Age of Enlightenment.[3]
https://stolenhistory.net/threads/notes-on-herbert-illig-phantom-time-theory.4188/#post-43061
Summary of a different version “Phantom Time” by Herbert Illich. You’ve heard of it of course?
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes, I had heard of that before I heard of Fomenko’s New Chronology
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dr Mason evaded answering your questions about Josephus- answered them only that way
He asked ” not sure where he’s coming from”
LikeLike
Idk what you mean. You think he evaded all three of my questions?
LikeLiked by 1 person
He managed to- what do you think yourself?
LikeLike
I thought he did a good job responding off the hip during the livestream. Answering questions can be difficult sometimes because while answering you can forget/distort the original question. This happens to me quite a bit when doing Street Epistemology
LikeLike
” off the cuff” perhaps
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry it’s Herbert Illig not Illich
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mourning relations at St George’s Chapel: Look at all the awards and medals even Princess Anne.
The Bohemian links to King Wenceslas. Where does all this history come from?
https://rosamondpress.com/2021/04/17/royal-bohemians-in-england/
LikeLike
idk. I skimmed through that article and didnt see any mention of the fundamental records
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s another expert for you to contact- maybe have an interview together?
https://andreumarfull.com/nc-english/
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t realize this until now but “YtEmoji Neue Chronologia” is his channel. I find that channel super annoying because he uploads a ridiculous amount of super short text videos and those just flood the search results for recent posts on YouTube about Fomenko’s New Chronology
Aside from that, his book looks interesting, I’ve read summaries on Fomenko’s website, and I’m sending an email to him right now to see if he’d be interested in chatting about it all
LikeLike
https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dictionary_of_Anonymous_and_Pseudonymous/fOZBXJ2eCiwC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Supplement+to+Palaeoromaica+1824&pg=PA394&printsec=frontcover
Some of the responses and further replies by Rev Brown. He died soon after this controversy …
Thx for finding the text!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it would have been interesting to see the evolution of the controversy had he lived for several more years or decades. It’s unfortunate he that passed away within 4 years of publishing his argument.
You’re welcome for the text. It was somewhat obscure to begin with but after I figured out its original title, it was easier to find.
LikeLike
This is M J Harper, aka Mick Harper: Megalithic Empire topic
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi. I’m interested in historical historians like Fomenko, people who come up with new and interesting things. These historians are not famous in my country. I wanted you to name people like “Fomenko”. Name all these historical historians who have new words. I do a Google search for their names so I can download their books. My country is hostile to the free internet, it may block Google soon. Please tell me the name of the historians “NEW CHRONOLOGY” Thank you.
LikeLike
What country are you in? I’m not aware of anyone I’d call a historian that’s like Fomenko. He’s kind of in a league of his own
LikeLike
Hi. Thank you for your answer. I am in Iran. I am looking for an accurate and correct study of history. I am interested in investigating the forgeries and lies of history. In my country, 99% of the books in the field of “Revisionist History” are not available. That’s why I download these books. I saw several people, each of whom told some of the fabrications and lies of history. Or they doubted in some parts of history. Some books are not on the Internet or are not in English. I think people like historians. “fomenko”
are. David Rohl’s
And uwe topper. If the site or something about “Revisionist History”
Or do you know historical forgeries and lies? Thank you for introducing me. You have a good site, thank you.
LikeLike
I’m not that familiar with Uwe Topper but I am aware of his work. I not that familiar with Rohl’s works either but the few interactions I’ve had with him were all unpleasant. Also I think David Falk has raised some important objections to Rohl’s New Chronology that I haven’t seen Rohl respond to.
I’ll be publishing an article soon about historical forgeries. Keep an eye out for it
LikeLike
Thank you I understood
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereus_Nuncius
From yr conversation with John Coleman in June 2020
Maybe time to do a posting- it’s only mentioned in passing as being a forgery on the Ministry of Truth
.
Regards
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey S!
Thanks For The Stuff On Odin & Christ.
Perfect Timing :]
LikeLiked by 1 person
np
LikeLike