"Seeking the Truth about Chronology Today"
This article contains my analysis of Fomenko’s History: Fiction or Science?, Volume 1, Chapter 1, Part 3.1.2. Chapter 1 is titled “The problems of historical chronology”, part 3 is titled “The veracity of the Scaliger-Petavius chronology was questioned as early as the 16th century”,… Continue Reading “CH. 1.3.1.2, VOL. 1, HISTORY: FICTION OR SCIENCE?”
This article contains the links to my detailed examination of Fomenko’s New Chronology and the overall grade that Fomenko’s New Chronology currently has. Fomenko’s current overall grade: 74/81, 91.35%, A-, 3.7 GPA[1] The examination’s completion: 81/102, 79.41% 1 – CH. 1.1, VOL. 1, HISTORY:… Continue Reading “Examining Fomenko’s New Chronology”
This article contains my analysis of Fomenko’s History: Fiction or Science?, Volume 1, Chapter 1, Part 3.1.1. Chapter 1 is titled “The problems of historical chronology”, part 3 is titled “The veracity of the Scaliger-Petavius chronology was questioned as early as the 16th century”,… Continue Reading “CH. 1.3.1.1, VOL. 1, HISTORY: FICTION OR SCIENCE?”
This article examines the instances of the use of the word “conspiracy” in the literature of Fomenko’s New Chronology. How It Was In Reality, Chapter 6.8[2]. This one is a reference to Ivan Petrovich Fyodorov-Chelyadnin conspiracy accusation.[13] History: Fiction or Science? e-Series Overview[3] “The… Continue Reading “Conspiracy in Fomenko’s New Chronology”
This article contains my analysis of Fomenko’s History: Fiction or Science?, Volume 1, Chapter 1, Part 2. Chapter 1 is titled “The problems of historical chronology”, and part 2 is titled “Scaliger, Petavius, and other clerical chronologers”. This part is relatively short, only containing… Continue Reading “Ch. 1.2, Vol. 1, History: Fiction or Science?”
This article contains my analysis of Fomenko’s History: Fiction or Science?, Volume 1, Chapter 1, Part 1. Chapter 1 is titled “The problems of historical chronology”, and part 1 is titled “Roman chronology as the foundation of European chronology”. This part is relatively short,… Continue Reading “Ch. 1.1, Vol. 1, History: Fiction or Science?”
Fomenko laid out 34 points of investigation (the enquête-code) that that can be used to create a biography for an historical figure. These can each be marked as EC1 to EC34. The information below is taken verbatim from pages 58 and 59 in Fomenko’s… Continue Reading “Fomenko’s Enquête-Code”
This article is in response to Fomenko’s How It Was In Reality, Chapter 7 part 14 [1]. His reference is [552] and is listed as “”The Moscow Kremlin. Arkhangelsk Cathedral”. – Moscow, State Historical and Cultural Museum-Reserve “Moscow Kremlin”, 1995.”. I haven’t been able to… Continue Reading “The Romanov Destruction of History”
Timeline of the controversies: 1981, June 29th – A meeting was held in the Department of History of the AS USSR to condemn Fomenko’s New Chronology. It was held under the chairmanship of academician Julian V. Bromley (1921-1990). Some other important names to mention… Continue Reading “Controversies Resulting from Fomenko’s New Chronology”
The four main authors: Anatoly T. Fomenko (1945-present) [1] – Biography Gleb V. Nosovsky (1958-present) [1] Tatyana N. Fomenko (1948-present) [1] Vladimir V. Kalashnikov (1942-2001) [1] Additional Authors: B. E. Brodsky [2, p423] B. S. Darkhovskiy [2, p423] ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ References: [1]… Continue Reading “Authors of Fomenko’s New Chronology”